The use of VAR (Video Assistant Referee) in the recent Celtic vs. Rangers match has sparked significant controversy, drawing condemnation from former Scottish Football Association (SFA) referees who have labeled the decisions made during the game as baffling. The Old Firm derby, one of the most fiercely contested fixtures in world football, was marred by a series of contentious calls that have reignited the debate over VAR’s effectiveness in the Scottish Premiership.
The match, which ended in a narrow victory for Celtic, was overshadowed by several key incidents that former referees believe were mishandled by VAR. These incidents have led to widespread criticism from pundits, fans, and former officials alike, who argue that the technology, rather than clarifying decisions, has instead added to the confusion and controversy.
One of the most contentious moments in the game occurred when a potential penalty for Rangers was reviewed by VAR after a Celtic defender appeared to handle the ball in the box. Despite the clear contact, the referee, after consulting the VAR, chose not to award a penalty, a decision that left many, including seasoned former referees, bewildered. According to them, this was a clear and obvious error that VAR was introduced to correct, but instead, it only compounded the controversy.
Another incident that drew criticism involved a disallowed goal for Celtic. The goal was ruled out for a marginal offside, with the decision being made after an extended VAR review. Former referees have pointed out that such minute decisions, often involving mere millimeters, undermine the spirit of the game. They argue that while the technology can be useful, it should not be relied upon to make calls so marginal that they could go unnoticed in real-time without the benefit of frame-by-frame analysis.
The former referees have also criticized the inconsistent application of VAR in the Scottish Premiership, suggesting that the standard of refereeing has not improved despite the introduction of the technology. They believe that while VAR was meant to assist referees and reduce the number of errors, it has instead led to a situation where referees are overly reliant on it, leading to hesitancy and inconsistency in their decision-making.
The criticism from former officials highlights a broader concern within the football community about the use of VAR. While it was introduced to eliminate clear and obvious errors, its implementation has often been questioned, with many arguing that it has removed the human element from refereeing and led to more disputes rather than fewer. The former referees have called for a review of how VAR is used in Scottish football, suggesting that the current system is not fit for purpose and that changes are needed to ensure that it enhances rather than detracts from the game.
In the aftermath of the Celtic vs. Rangers game, there have been calls from various quarters for the SFA to address the concerns raised by former referees and to take steps to improve the consistency and clarity of VAR decisions. Some have even suggested that the technology should be scrapped altogether if it continues to generate such widespread controversy.
For now, the debate over VAR in Scottish football is likely to continue, with the Celtic vs. Rangers game serving as a flashpoint in the ongoing discussion about the role of technology in the sport. As the season progresses, all eyes will be on how the SFA responds to the criticism and whether any meaningful changes are made to restore confidence in the officiating of the Scottish Premiership’s most high-profile matches.
Leave a Reply